Dollar Bill

Members
  • Content Count

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dollar Bill

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

585 profile views
  1. https://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-angels-anaheim-lease-20190109-story.html
  2. https://www.latimes.com/sports/angels/la-sp-mlb-shaikin-angels-20180518-story.html
  3. Dollar Bill

    LAT: The Ohtani Effect

    In use since 1969 (for the Seattle Pilots), twice renovated for Angels.
  4. Dollar Bill

    LAT: The Ohtani Effect

    http://www.latimes.com/sports/mlb/la-sp-angels-ohtani-20180211-story.html
  5. Dollar Bill

    Source: Angels "have to be" in on Darvish

    Those are MLB rights, not the Angels' rights. International broadcast rights fees are shared revenue (with an exception for the Blue Jays in the Toronto market).
  6. Dollar Bill

    Stadium Journey - Angel Stadium Review

    Arte and the city did not reach agreement on a new (or renegotiated) lease.
  7. http://www.latimes.com/sports/angels/la-sp-angels-chavez-norris-20170919-story.html
  8. This isn't just Scioscia. This also is Eppler: http://www.latimes.com/sports/angels/la-sp-angels-report-20170626-story.html Keep in mind that what managers and general managers say to the media might not always be what they're saying behind closed doors. Most management types avoid any public comments that could embarrass a player. That said, actions speak louder than words. And Jeff is 100% correct about the direction in which media coverage is heading. As teams and leagues increasingly control their own media -- the Angels and Dodgers each own all or part of their TV and radio stations, and they have websites and growing social media followings -- they're keeping more of the access for themselves, breaking their own news and putting their own spin on it. The Dodgers are the best team in baseball, and on most days there are two independent reporters covering them, even as the clubhouse is crowded with employees of the team, mlb.com, SportsNet LA, etc. The team media provide another vehicle to sell tickets and T-shirts. The team media can't criticize ownership or management -- see this week's Deadspin story about how mlb.com sanitized a column originally critical of the Rangers' actions in the wake of Hurricane Harvey. The Dodgers' team media doesn't mention how half of LA does not see the games on TV. The casual fans don't much care: just tell them who won and if Mike Trout hit a home run. Ultimately, it will be the hardcore fans (all of you) that determine whether independent media remains viable. Unfortunately, that means paying -- for the Times, for the Register, for the Athletic, whatever. And, for that hard-earned money, you should get coverage responsive to your interests and questions. We'll see how this plays out. And, ICYMI, Pedro Moura has addressed how much it matters that Pujols hits third, and the analytics responsive to that question: http://www.latimes.com/sports/angels/la-sp-angels-mailbag-20170828-story.html
  9. Dollar Bill

    The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

    Nope. The number of viewers the Angels could reach on TV did not change because the name did. The Angels didn't choose to fight the city; the city sued the Angels.
  10. Dollar Bill

    The Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

    There is zero evidence the name change had anything to do with this. The Angels were in the LA TV market before the name change, and ad buyers knew that. Fox paid the Angels $3 billion because the Dodgers were in the process of being sold, and Fox couldn't risk losing the rights to the Angels and Dodgers, because Fox Sports West and Prime Ticket probably would have collapsed. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/08/sports/la-sp-angels-fox-tv-20111209
  11. http://www.latimes.com/sports/mlb/la-sp-trout-mvp-shaikin-20170603-story.html
  12. MLB and the players' association are partners in putting on the WBC. A contract that prevents a player from participating in the WBC never would be approved. Trout has been asked a million times about this. He didn't want to play. That's it.
  13. I saw that press release too, Chuck. Not sure where they're getting the numbers - maybe the secondary market (Cubs and Giants fans) - but $60 is way above average for face value. http://losangeles.angels.mlb.com/ticketing/pricing.jsp?c_id=ana&layout=gameflow&view=spring
  14. The city and the Angels did not reach a new agreement, so the old one remains in place.
  15. No changes. Still required in all official uses to satisfy lease. Not used in any other way.