Dochalo

The Official Los Angeles Angels Minor League Statlines & Prospects thread

2,181 posts in this topic

25 minutes ago, totdprods said:

I can't see the Kotchman comparisons. Kotch was a brilliant fielder and supposed to be a hitting machine. 

Thaiss was never projected to be that. I think people are simply looking at what Kotchman became and seeing that as a Thaiss comp, but the two weren't ever on the same page as a prospect.

I think it's just because they both lack the HR pop for a prototypical top 1B prospect while still considered "solid" offensive players. It's a fine comparison in that respect. But I think Kotchman had a much superior hit tool, ability to take a walk, and was better with the glove.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Kotchman....if only Russell Martin remembered that he was a MLB catcher, and not Dodgeball star Peter LeFleur.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, eaterfan said:

I think it's just because they both lack the HR pop for a prototypical top 1B prospect while still considered "solid" offensive players. It's a fine comparison in that respect. But I think Kotchman had a much superior hit tool, ability to take a walk, and was better with the glove.

That's where I'm getting the Kotchman comparisons; I see Thaiss as a guy who maybe hits 15 hrs and bats .270 over a full MLB season, without the other tools that Kotchman had. Pretty meh. I agree that we should look to trade him while he's still a top 5 in our system and hasn't been overtaken by the younger guys. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thaiss is a pretty good defender. Not quite at Kotchman's level, but still above average.

Honestly you have to take minor league production with a heaping mound of salt. Guys routinely kill it right up until they reach the bigs, then completely shit the bed. There's also plenty of players who never really wow'd as prospects but turn into solid MLB regulars. Thaiss is still a pretty good prospect to have, especially when we're so weak at 1B right now.

The lack of power is certainly concerning, but Trout never hit for power in the minors either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, NachoPop said:

The 30 breaks down:

OF - 8

Pitchers - 15 (12 RH, 3 LH)

SS - 5

C - 1

1B - 1

Not exactly a lot of variety is there?

....what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

....what?

Just saying there's a lot of Pitchers, OF and SS's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

I love how the "Overall" rating for Adell is 50. 

Lame.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, totdprods said:

Keep in mind that only about one year ago, Thaiss was still playing college ball, and he's already in AA, holding his own.

He's played virtually one full season now in pro ball, 163 games, and he's slashing .277/.356/.417/.773 with 180 hits, 92 runs, 33 doubles, 14 homers, 8 triples, 95 RBIs, and 70 walks to 108 strikeouts. All while playing a new position.

He may not be the most exciting prospect but his ability to climb the system quickly while exhibiting good patience, contact, and power potential and be almost MLB-ready already offsets that need for prospect sexiness.

Not only that, but there's more left in the tank for Thaiss.  He only became serious about strength training and nutrition just this year, and he's 22. He already looks a lot different than he did a year ago.  Thaiss has a beautiful swing and the authority in which he smokes balls into the gaps is reminiscent of Hermosillo, which is reminiscent of Trout back when he was 18.  Once Thaiss grows into his man body, typically around 24 or 25, a lot of those doubles will start turning into HR's. 

I wouldn't trade Thaiss.  Our 1B haven't exactly been lighting the world on fire and worst case scenario, with Thaiss you've got someone that's inexpensive, will get on base and play solid defense.  Again, better than anything we have right now.  Best case scenario, he ends up hitting .300/.400 with 40 DB 25 HR.  

I like the likely outcome here is a kid that hits .270/.350 35 DB 15 HR and solid defense at 1B.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I complain about BA, FG and BP plenty, and rightfully so because they're glaringly terrible or negligent.  But I gotta say, MLB takes the cake for the worst. 

They ignore Trent Derveaux, D'Shawn Knowles (both understandable for a fan site, not for a professional group being paid to do this), Ryan Vega, Jonah Todd, Jonah Wesely, Jerryell Rivera, Brendon Sanger, Jose Rojas, Zach Houchins, Johan Sala......you know....the guys you start ranking if you actually pay attention.  

And instead we're served a hefty diet of retreads in Jared Foster, Julio Garcia, Vicente Campos and Connor Justus.

Not only does their ranking reek of a lack of effort, so does their scouting.  A 50 grade for Adell, 50 power for Marsh, 45 curve and change for Castillo, 45 slider for Jewell, 50 curve for Gatto......

Are they even watching?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Scotty@AW said:

I complain about BA, FG and BP plenty, and rightfully so because they're glaringly terrible or negligent.  But I gotta say, MLB takes the cake for the worst. 

They ignore Trent Derveaux, D'Shawn Knowles (both understandable for a fan site, not for a professional group being paid to do this), Ryan Vega, Jonah Todd, Jonah Wesely, Jerryell Rivera, Brendon Sanger, Jose Rojas, Zach Houchins, Johan Sala......you know....the guys you start ranking if you actually pay attention.  

And instead we're served a hefty diet of retreads in Jared Foster, Julio Garcia, Vicente Campos and Connor Justus.

Not only does their ranking reek of a lack of effort, so does their scouting.  A 50 grade for Adell, 50 power for Marsh, 45 curve and change for Castillo, 45 slider for Jewell, 50 curve for Gatto......

Are they even watching?

nailed it.  My biggest complaint about most of these lists is that they're generic.  MLB trumps that with being generic and lazy. They literally just made up a bunch of crap.   

here are their grades for Barria:  Fastball: 55 | Curveball: 50 | Changeup: 55 | Control: 60 | Overall: 45

wait.  what?

That  gives me the brain pain coach Klein.    

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How the heck do they rate Barria a 45 overall, when his individuals  are 50 to 60?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Scotty@AW said:

I complain about BA, FG and BP plenty, and rightfully so because they're glaringly terrible or negligent.  But I gotta say, MLB takes the cake for the worst. 

They ignore Trent Derveaux, D'Shawn Knowles (both understandable for a fan site, not for a professional group being paid to do this), Ryan Vega, Jonah Todd, Jonah Wesely, Jerryell Rivera, Brendon Sanger, Jose Rojas, Zach Houchins, Johan Sala......you know....the guys you start ranking if you actually pay attention.  

And instead we're served a hefty diet of retreads in Jared Foster, Julio Garcia, Vicente Campos and Connor Justus.

Not only does their ranking reek of a lack of effort, so does their scouting.  A 50 grade for Adell, 50 power for Marsh, 45 curve and change for Castillo, 45 slider for Jewell, 50 curve for Gatto......

Are they even watching?

I think this is largely BS. Yes, they miss on the occasional Calhoun but in this site everyone is going to be a star or average starter. Yeah, they haven't rated the Angels system well, but frankly it's been total shit since Trout graduated and they traded Segura. It's been what, 6 years and Calhoun is the best player produced since then. Not only that but Cam Bedrosian is probably second. Maybe, it's Cron but even you just remarked how bad our 1B situation is.

Yeah, we currently have a lot of guys at really low levels who have high ceilings. You know who else does? Every other team. You know who has scrappy late developers in the higher levels who are putting up decent numbers like Hermosillo? Everyone else. 80% of both these categories wash out. The national publications are going to be lower on them and will miss on them when they make it. Angels specific sights will be higher on them and miss on them when they bust. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Angel Oracle said:

How the hell do they rate Barria a 45 overall, when his individuals  are 50 to 60?

Cause Velocity? Little known fact: no batter ever got out until Rube Wadell hit 110 MPH with his fastball in 1905. Before that, teams just batted around until they got tired. #BadHistory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monday, July 24th, 2017:
Salt Lake (54-48) lost 4 to 8 to Albuquerque (52-50)
David Fletcher: 2-5, 2 R
Jefry Marte: 2-5, 2 2B, 3 RBI - hitting .400 with 14 RBI last 10 games; overall, .278/.340/.500 with 8 2B, 8 HR and 33 RBI in 35 games
Carlos Perez: 2-5, 2 2B, R - hitting .425 last 10 games; overall, .390/.463/.552/1.015 in 46 games, 172 ABs - 25 BB to 26 K
Luis Diaz: 6 IP, 7 H, 3 ER, 2 BB, 3 K - started year untouchable in AA, got hit around in AAA, is starting to get back on track 
Andrew Bailey: 1 IP, 3 H, 2 ER, HR
Eduardo Paredes: 1.1 IP, K

Inland Empire (47-54) lost 1 to 3 to Lake Elsinore (48-53)
Jahmai Jones: 2-5, K - through five games, slashing .450/.542/.500/1.042, 4 walks to 4 strikeouts
Brennon Lund: 2-3, BB - still hitting! .429 last 10 games, .340 in 162 at-bats with Inland Empire. Could see him going to Mobile if/when Herm moves up to SLC
Jack Kruger: 2-4, K
Jared Walsh: 2-3, 2B
Luis Pena: 6 IP, 7 H, 3 ER, 2 BB, 6 K, HR
Sam Holland: 2 IP, BB, 4 K - 46 IP, 2.74 ERA, .233 BAA, 1.24 WHIP, 17 BB to  48 K

Burlington (44-56) lost 1 to 3 to Dayton (53-48)
Jonah Todd: 1-4, R
Turning a corner?
Joe Gatto: 5 IP, 2 H, ER, 2 BB, 6 K - last four GS: 20 IP, 1.80 ERA, 15 H, 4 ER, 5 BB, 18 K
Control has still been an issue, but he's now sporting a 3.65 ERA, .254 BAA, and 1.46 WHIP in 20 games started - only two HRs allowed in 91.1 IP

Orem (24-10) lost 3 to 6 to Billings (17-17)
Leonardo Rivas: 1-5, R
Spencer Griffin: 1-4, HR (1), BB, 3 K
Ryan Vega: 1-4, 2B, 2 RBI, BB, K
Jeyson Sanchez: 1-3, 2B, BB, 2 K
Torii Hunter: 3-4, R, SB (3)
James Ziemba: 1 IP, BB, 2 K - 6'10" lefty, 13.1 IP, 5 ER, 7 BB to 12 K

DSL Angels (19-23) lost 0 to 4 to DSL Twins (31-12) - make-up of 7/24 postponement 
Julio De La Cruz (SS): 0-2, 2 BB, 2 K, SB (6)- slashing .229/.350/.373 - 6 2B, 4 3B, 1 HR, 19 BB in 118 ABs -  he's only 16 years old though!
Rafael Fortunato: 3 IP, 3 H, BB, 5 K - 9 GS, 35.2 IP, 2.02 ERA, .209 BAA, 1.01 WHIP, 9 BB to 28 K - 19 years old

DSL Angels (19-23) lost 4 to 7 to DSL Twins (31-12)
Oliver Carmona: 1-2, 2 R, BB, K
Cristian Gomez: 1-3, HR (4)
Julio De La Cruz: 1-3, 2B, 2 RBI
 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, eaterfan said:

I think this is largely BS. Yes, they miss on the occasional Calhoun but in this site everyone is going to be a star or average starter. Yeah, they haven't rated the Angels system well, but frankly it's been total shit since Trout graduated and they traded Segura. It's been what, 6 years and Calhoun is the best player produced since then. Not only that but Cam Bedrosian is probably second. Maybe, it's Cron but even you just remarked how bad our 1B situation is.

Yeah, we currently have a lot of guys at really low levels who have high ceilings. You know who else does? Every other team. You know who has scrappy late developers in the higher levels who are putting up decent numbers like Hermosillo? Everyone else. 80% of both these categories wash out. The national publications are going to be lower on them and will miss on them when they make it. Angels specific sights will be higher on them and miss on them when they bust. 

Hermosillo isn't exactly a late bloomer. He's 22 years old in Double-A, 2 years younger than the league average.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, zenmaster said:

So we still don't have a player in the top 100 on MLB.com? :(

 

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/244152682/yoan-moncada-tops-2017-midseason-prospect-list/

 

I don't care much for these lists in general and rarely do I have a reaction to them -- but that's one really bad list IMO.   Very erratic, extremely subjective and pretty much devoid of any center.   Normally, you can look at a list and kinda get what they are putting weight into but they are really all over the place with this one.   There are seriously 20 or more guys that seemingly are making that list for no other reason other than Jonathan Mayo seems to like them.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Inside Pitch said:

There are seriously 20 or more guys that seemingly are making that list for no other reason other than Jonathan Mayo seems to like them.

Mayo's best work was in the Hills Have Eyes.

 horror scream rip horror movies wes craven GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, vladdy#27 said:

Hermosillo isn't exactly a late bloomer. He's 22 years old in Double-A, 2 years younger than the league average.

Hermosillo is very much a "slow" bloomer if not a late bloomer, yes he's 22 but he's also in his 5th year of pro ball.  That's not a criticism on my part.... I believe he's doing fine, he fits the normal development pace for his type but what Eaterfan is saying is that you can find an Hermosillo in most organizations  -- He's right.

I too believe the Anti-Angels bias is being overplayed, while at the same time understanding why people feel that way..   Still IMO, the Angels earned their rankings and the associated reputation.... there was just a lot to dislike about the system for a long, long time..    But again -- where they have been criminally underrated is in their ability to actually graduate the few prospects they HAVE had..   At the end of the day, none of us should really give a shit where we rank, if we can get back to producing a quality player every year or other year this franchise will be back where it used to be.   The team is trending in the right direction.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carlos Perez: 2-5, 2 2B, R - hitting .425 last 10 games; overall, .390/.463/.552/1.015 in 46 games, 172 ABs - 25 BB to 26 K

 

Who does Carlos have to blow to get back on the 25 man roster?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Carlos Perez: 2-5, 2 2B, R - hitting .425 last 10 games; overall, .390/.463/.552/1.015 in 46 games, 172 ABs - 25 BB to 26 K

 

Who does Carlos have to blow to get back on the 25 man roster?

Cowart 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now